Woman whose boyfriend proposed with £15 ring reveals mum ‘disgusted’

Woman whose boyfriend proposed with £15 ring reveals mum ‘disgusted’

Bride-to-be whose boyfriend proposed with a £15 ring reveals her mother is ‘disgusted’ by the affordable stone and claims it’s ‘not a real engagement’

  • Woman took to Mumsnet to reveal her boyfriend of three years had proposed
  • Admitted that when her mother found out the ring cost £15 she was ‘disgusted’
  • Said she didn’t think the price was important but asked others what they thought
  • Most said it wasn’t the ring but the gesture that mattered, some branded it ‘tight’ 

A woman has sparked a lively debate over whether the price of an engagement ring is important. 

The unnamed mother took to Mumsnet this week and revealed her  joy over her boyfriend of three years proposing. 

However her excitement was short-lived, as when her mother discovered the ring had only cost £15, she branded it ‘not a real engagement’.

Taking to the British parenting network, the disappointed woman asked other users whether she was being unreasonable in thinking it wasn’t the cost of the ring that mattered, but the thought behind it – and was met with agreement from outraged parents.

An unnamed mother took to Mumsnet this week and revealed her joy over her boyfriend of three years proposing – however admitted that her mother was disgusted when she discovered the ring cost £15

Kicking off the debate, the woman wrote: ‘Partner of three years asked me to marry him this morning and gave me a ring that I’d said I’d liked in a jeweller’s window a couple of months back, it was £15.’

Explaining that the couple don’t earn a lot, she continued: ‘We don’t have a lot of money and I’ve always said I’m not bothered about having an expensive ring as it’s not the ring that matters to me, it’s the commitment of marriage for our future.

‘So I was just as happy when he asked me as I would have been with an expensive ring.’

However her mother reacted very differently, she revealed, adding: ‘But when I rang my mum to tell her she was shocked and disgusted that my partner hadn’t spent more money on the ring and said it basically doesn’t count as an engagement.

Taking to the parenting network, the disappointed woman asked other users whether she was being unreasonable in thinking it wasn’t the cost of the ring that mattered, but the thought behind it – and was met with agreement from outraged parents

‘I’m not really into wearing jewellery and am not materialistic so the actual ring has never been a big deal to me! Is this just me?’.

And other users quickly reacted with shock at the confession, branding the mother ‘materialistic’.

One wrote: ‘She’s being daft, you don’t need a ring at all for an engagement let alone an expensive one’.

Agreeing, another said: ‘The price of the ring doesn’t count, its what the ring symbolises. And as long as you love it it, who cares what anyone else thinks?’

‘She does know that a ring doesn’t make a relationship, she’s being a bit silly,’ another added.

Most users quickly reacted with shock at the confession, branding the mother ‘materialistic’ with one writing: ‘She does know that a ring doesn’t make a relationship, she’s being a bit silly,’

Meanwhile one mother argued: ‘A £15 ring is fine if it’s made of an enduring metal (I’ve got a Georgian silver ring that has lasted 250 years and is only a bit thinner)’.

And one branded it wrong to judge a man’s love by the ring, adding: ‘It’s dumb to assume something that costs £2500 is ‘better’ or has more love or worth just because of the price tag.’

But while the majority argued the price of the ring was not important, a few claimed £15 was ‘a bit tight’.

One wrote: ‘My own ring took my dh (dear husband) months to save for, it cost him a ridiculous amount of money and the commitment it took him to get it for me means a lot, and is a nice story to tell our dc. 

‘So for that reason I love my expensive ring but I don’t judge anyone else’s.’

Another added: ‘Tbh £15 is a bit tight. Mine was £150 and dh (dear husband) took payment plan on it and paid it off over a year.’

Elsewhere one questioned whether the woman’s fiance was worried she may say no, writing: ‘Maybe he just bought a cheap ring in case you said no? £15 really is very miserly! I agree with you in general, but £15?’.

But while the majority argued the price of the ring was not important, a few claimed £15 was ‘a bit tight’, with one writing: ‘Tbh £15 is a bit tight. Mine was £150 and dh (dear husband) took payment plan on it and paid it off over a year.’

Source: Read Full Article