How an expert tracked exactly where missing plane MH370 could be

Will MH370 FINALLY be found? Expert claims he knows EXACTLY where the doomed plane is as he drops bombshell theory the pilot ‘was being followed’ – and families claim it was NOT an accident

  • MH370 vanished shortly after leaving Kuala Lumpur for Beijing on March 8, 2014 
  • Despite an extensive international search effort, the wreckage is yet to be found
  • British aerospace engineer Richard Godfrey believes it is 1933 due west of Perth
  • He analysed disturbances in radio frequencies to pinpoint its ill-fated final path 
  • In light of his findings, victim’s families believe the crash was an act of murder 

A plane expert believes he has finally discovered the resting place of ill-fated MH370 using sophisticated radio wave technology, as he claims the pilot’s ‘strange’ course suggests he may have been ‘being followed’. 

The Malaysian Airlines flight carrying 239 people, including six Australians, vanished without a trace on March 8 2014, shortly after leaving Kuala Lumpur for Beijing.  

Despite an extensive four-year $200million international search effort spanning more than 120,000sqm, the Boeing 777’s wreckage is yet to be found, with devastated families claiming the crash was not an accident. 

But British aerospace engineer Richard Godfrey believes MH370 hit the ocean 1933 km due west of Perth, and lies 4,000m under the water, along a line known as the ‘seventh arc’.

Using Weak Signal Propagation Reporter analysis, Mr Godfrey tracked disturbances the plane made in radio frequencies across the globe to uncover its final path. 

This graphic shows Mr Godfrey’s predicted location for MH370’s wreckage at the bottom of the Indian Ocean

He found unusual patterns in the aircraft’s journey, including doing 360 degree turns over the ocean, which he claims supports a theory pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah deliberately took the plane off course.

‘Everyone has assumed up until now there was a straight path, perhaps even on autopilot,’ he told 60 Minutes on Sunday.

‘I believe there was an active pilot for the whole flight.’ 

Three hours into the journey, the aircraft entered an unusual holding pattern, which lasted for around 20 minutes, according to Mr Godfrey’s findings. 

A holding pattern is when a pilot keeps the aircraft in a pattern within a specified airspace, usually to await further clearance to proceed, typically before landing.

Mr Godfrey believes the temporary stall may indicate the pilot had stopped to make contact with Malaysian authorities – despite the government maintaining contact with the aircraft ceased 38 minutes after take off.  

‘It’s strange to me, if you’re trying to lose an aircraft in the most remote part of the Southern Indian Ocean, that you [would] enter a holding pattern,’ Mr Godfrey explained.

British aerospace engineer Richard Godfrey has written a report outlining his belief that the remains of MH370 are 4000m under the water 1933km due west of Perth

The seventh arc (pictured) is a vast area of the Indian Ocean off the coast of Western Australia where experts believe the plane flew – and likely met its end

Pictured: Mr Godfrey’s proposed flight path taken by MH370 on its final voyage 

‘He may have been communicating with the Malaysian government, he may have been checking whether he was being followed.

‘He may have just simply wanted time to make up his mind, where he would go from here. I hope that if there was any contact with Malaysian authorities that after eight years now they’d be willing to divulge that.’

Danica Weeks’ husband Paul was one of six Australians believed to have died when the plane disappeared almost eight years ago.  

Until Mr Godfrey’s findings, she had long insisted the plane had suffered a mechanical failure. Now, she believes the crash was an act of murder.

‘I was so staunch about saying it wasn’t the pilot,’ she told Sky News. 

‘But now I have to throw all of that out after nearly eight years (since the disappearance) and three years of searching (for the plane, by the authorities).

‘I never believed it was the pilot. Unfortunately, Richard Godfrey has said that he believes with this point that the pilot was in control. And look, it makes sense that we’ve searched for a ghost plane, haven’t found it. So maybe we have to step forward and … search on that basis now.’

The mother-of-two, who remarried two years ago, says her life is on hold as she waits for closure to fulfil her promise of bringing her former husband’s body home.  

Pictured: MH370 captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, who was flying the plane alongside First Officer Fariq Abdul Hamid

Danica Weeks lost her husband Paul (pictured together) when MH370 vanished almost eight years ago

The widow is calling for a renewed search in light of Mr Godfrey’s report, which was first released late last year.  

‘Let’s join the dots, if this isn’t worth another search, then I don’t know what is,’ she told 60 Minutes. 

‘I have done my research on it, and it looks so promising. I get goosebumps. I look at it, and I think, this is it.’  

‘It has been such a long time with no closure, no answers. There’s no day I don’t think about it. I promised Pauly I would bring him home. I still haven’t fulfilled that.’ 

Ms Weeks said she met with the Malaysian Prime Minister, who vowed to continue the search, but his promises never eventuated.

‘I [was thinking] yes we have made a mark, they are going to take action, then it was deathly silent. It was all just talk,’ she said.  

‘I believe his finding are solid. And so why wouldn’t they search? then I’d be wondering why not. If they don’t search, because this is, this is it. I feel this it.’ 

Other experts are peer-researching Mr Godfrey’s findings, and if it receives positive reviews they will lobby the Malaysian government to reopen the search. 

Mr Godfrey said while Malaysian authorities have thanked him for passing on his work, but told him they were ‘very busy’.

‘If it turns out the pilot was in anyway responsible, they might be faced with multimillion claims,’ he said. 

The Malaysian Airlines plane disappeared in March of 2014 with 239 people on board (stock image)

Mr Godfrey claims the plane is located on the ocean floor in an area at the base of the Broken Ridge underwater plateau (pictured) 

‘So maybe they just hope this will go away.’  

However, experts have expressed doubts over the reliability of the WSPR data, which places the plane in an underwater mountainous region of the Southern Indian Ocean. 

Mr Godfrey claims it was missed in previous searches. 

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau described Mr Godfrey as ‘credible’ but said it would not launch a fresh investigation.

‘The ATSB is aware of the work of Mr Richard Godfrey and acknowledges that he is a credible expert on the subject of MH370,’ ATSB Chief Commissioner Angus Mitchell said in a statement.

‘But the ATSB does not have the technical expertise to, and has not been requested to, review his “MH370 Flight Path” paper and workings. As such the ATSB cannot offer an assessment of the validity of Mr Godfrey’s work using WSPR data.’

Mr Mitchell said Mr Godfrey’s findings would be passed on to Geoscience Australia for review to ensure no items of interest were missed during the initial search. 

‘The ATSB does acknowledge that Mr Godfrey’s work recommends a search zone for MH370, a significant portion of which covers an area searched during the ATSB-led underwater search,’ he said. 

‘Out of due diligence the ATSB requested Geoscience Australia review the data it held from the search to re-validate that no items of interest were detected in that area.’


Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured) was the pilot of the doomed flight


Pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah planned mass murder because of personal problems, locking his co-pilot out of the cockpit, closing down all communications, depressurising the main cabin and then disabling the aircraft so that it continued flying on auto-pilot until it ran out of fuel.

That was the popular theory in the weeks after the plane’s disappearance. 

His personal problems, rumours in Kuala Lumpur said, included a split with his wife Fizah Khan, and his fury that a relative, opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, had been given a five-year jail sentence for sodomy shortly before he boarded the plane for the flight to Beijing.

But the pilot’s wife angrily denied any personal problems and other family members and his friends said he was a devoted family man and loved his job.

This theory was also the conclusion of the first independent study into the disaster by the New Zealand-based air accident investigator, Ewan Wilson.

Wilson, the founder of Kiwi Airlines and a commercial pilot himself, arrived at the shocking conclusion after considering ‘every conceivable alternative scenario’.

However, he has not been able to provide any conclusive evidence to support his theory.

The claims are made in the book ‘Goodnight Malaysian 370’, which Wilson co-wrote with the New Zealand broadsheet journalist, Geoff Taylor.

It’s also been rumoured that Zaharie used a flight simulator at his home to plot a path to a remote island.

However, officials in Kuala Lumpur declared that Malaysian police and the FBI’s technical experts had found nothing to suggest he was planning to hijack the flight after closely examining his flight simulator. 

And there are also theories that the tragic disappearance may have been a heroic act of sacrifice by the pilot.

Australian aviation enthusiast Michael Gilbert believes the doomed plane caught fire mid-flight, forcing the pilot to plot a course away from heavily populated areas. 


Co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid, 27, again for personal problems, was suspected by rumour-spreaders to have overpowered the pilot and disabled the aircraft, flying it to its doom with crew and passengers unable to get through the locked cockpit door.

Theorists have put forward the suggestion that he was having relationship problems and this was his dramatic way of taking his own life.

But he was engaged to be married to Captain Nadira Ramli, 26, a fellow pilot from another airline, and loved his job. There are no known reasons for him to have taken any fatal action.

There have been a series of outlandish theories about the disappearance of the plane

Others have suggested that because he was known to have occasionally invited young women into the cockpit during a flight, he had done so this time and something had gone wrong.

Young Jonti Roos said in March that she spent an entire flight in 2011 in the cockpit being entertained by Hamid, who was smoking.

Interest in the co-pilot was renewed when it was revealed he was the last person to communicate from the cockpit after the communication system was cut off. 


An expert has claimed the missing Malaysia Airlines flight 370 was hijacked on the orders of Vladimir Putin and secretly landed in Kazakhstan.

Jeff Wise, a U.S. science writer who spearheaded CNN’s coverage of the Boeing 777-200E, has based his outlandish theory on pings that the plane gave off for seven hours after it went missing, that were recorded by British telecommunications company Inmarsat.

Wise believes that hijackers ‘spoofed’ the plane’s navigation data to make it seem like it went in another direction, but flew it to the Baikonur Cosmodrome, which is leased from Kazakhstan by Russia.

However, Wise admits in New York Magazine that he does not know why Vladimir Putin would want to steal a plane full of people and that his idea is somewhat ‘crazy’.

Wise also noted there were three Russian men onboard the flight, two of them Ukrainian passport holders.

Aviation disaster experts analysed satellite data and discovered – like the data recorded by Inmarsat – that the plane flew on for hours after losing contact.

Careful examination of the evidence has revealed that MH370 made three turns after the last radio call, first a turn to the left, then two more, taking the plane west, then south towards Antarctica.


This extraordinary claim came from 41-year-old British yachtsman Katherine Tee, from Liverpool, whose initial account of seeing what she thought was a burning plane in the night sky made headlines around the world.

On arrival in Thailand’s Phuket after sailing across the Indian Ocean from Cochin, southern India with her husband, she said: ‘I could see the outline of the plane – it looked longer than planes usually do.There was what appeared to be black smoke streaming from behind.’

Ms Tee’s general description of the time and place was vague and she lost all credibility when she later stated on her blog that she believed MH370 was a kamikaze plane that was aimed at a flotilla of Chinese ships and it was shot down before it could smash into the vessels.

Without solid proof of the satellite data, she wrote on her blog, Saucy Sailoress, the plane she saw was flying at low altitude towards the military convoy she and her husband had seen on recent nights. She added that internet research showed a Chinese flotilla was in the area at the time.

While the debris proved the plane went down in the Indian Ocean, the location of the main underwater wreckage — and its crucial black box data recorders — remains stubbornly elusive. 


On a flight from Jeddah to Kuala Lumpur that crossed over the Andaman Sea on March 8, Malaysian woman Raja Dalelah, 53, saw what she believed was a plane sitting on the water’s surface.

She didn’t know about the search that had been started for MH370. She alerted a stewardess who told her to go back to sleep.

‘I was shocked to see what looked like the tail and wing of an aircraft on the water,’ she said.

It was only when she told her friends on landing in Kuala Lumpur what she had seen that she learned of the missing jet. She had seen the object at about 2.30pm Malaysian time.

She said she had been able to identify several ships and islands before noticing the silver object that she said was a plane.

But her story was laughed off by pilots who said it would have been impossible to have seen part of an aircraft in the water from 35,000ft or seven miles.

Ms Raja filed an official report with police the same day and has kept to her story.

‘I know what I saw,’ she said.


A catastrophic event such as a fire disabling much of the equipment resulted in the pilots turning the plane back towards the Malaysian peninsula in the hope of landing at the nearest airport.

Satellite data, believable or not, suggests the aircraft did make a turn and theorists say there would be no reason for the pilots to change course unless confronted with an emergency.

A fire in a similar Boeing 777 jet parked at Cairo airport in 2011 was found to have been caused by a problem with the first officer’s oxygen mask supply tubing.

Stewarts Law, which has litigated in a series of recent air disasters, believes the plane crashed after a fire – similar to the blaze on the Cairo airport runway – broke out in the cockpit.

After an investigation into the Cairo blaze, Egypt’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Central Directorate (EAAICD) released their final report which revealed that the fire originated near the first officer’s oxygen mask supply tubing.

The cause of the fire could not be conclusively determined, but investigators pinpointed a problem with the cockpit hose used to provide oxygen for the crew in the event of decompression.

Following the 2011 fire, US aircraft owners were instructed to replace the system – it was estimated to cost $2,596 (£1,573) per aircraft. It was not known whether Malaysia Airlines had carried out the change.

If either pilot wanted to crash the plane, why turn it around? So the turn-around suggests they were trying to land as soon as possible because of an emergency.


The Boeing 777 was shot down by the Americans who feared the aircraft had been hijacked and was about to be used to attack the U.S. military base on Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian Ocean. So conspiracy theorists claim.

And former French airline director Marc Dugain said he had been warned by British intelligence that he was taking risks by investigating this angle.

There is no way of checking whether Dugain received such a warning or why he believes the Americans shot down the plane.

But adding to the theory that the aircraft was flown to Diego Garcia, either by the pilot Zaharie or a hijacker, was the claim that on the pilot’s home flight simulator was a ‘practice’ flight to the island.

Professor Glees said: ‘The Americans would have no interest in doing anything of the kind and not telling the world.

‘In theory, they might wish to shoot down a plane they thought was attacking them but they wouldn’t just fire missiles, they’d investigate it first with fighters and would quickly realise that even if it had to be shot down, the world would need to know.’

Mr Rosenschein said: ‘The U.S. would not have been able to hide this fact and in any event, if it were true, they would have admitted their action as it would have prevented a successful terrorist action on this occasion and acted as a deterrent for future terrorist attacks.’ 

The ATSB expects that review to be finalised in coming weeks, the results from which will be made public on the ATSB’s website.

While a formal conclusion over MH370’s fate is yet to be reached, many theories and conspiracies have circulated since the plane’s disappearance. 

A popular theory from respected aviation journalist Christine Negroni is that the plane’s cabin pressure system rapidly decompressed, sucking out all the oxygen.

With Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah in the bathroom, First Officer Fariq Abdul Hamid is believed to have taken over.

Negroni surmises that co-pilot Hamid was left with a major problem with zero access to oxygen – and even with a mask, he would have been in trouble and not able to think clearly.

His arms also would have started to jerk spasmodically.

This is why Ms Negroni believes the plane was switched to ‘standby’ instead of putting out a mayday call –  explaining why the transponder signal stopped and controllers could still see the airplane on radar but couldn’t determine its altitude.

Additionally, someone was still flying the plane – and flying it on a bizarre course, turning southwest, then north and then south. 

Ms Negroni is adamant co-pilot Mr Hamid, 27, quickly overcome with oxygen deprivation, was at the controls.

‘I think he was no longer doing much reasoning, because his ability to do that was long gone,’ she said.

‘When you consider how muddled Fariq’s mind must have been, you can see many ways in which MH-370’s bizarre flight path can be explained.’

The plane then flew hours more, likely on autopilot, and vanished.

Queensland couples Catherine and Robert Lawton as well as Mary and Rodney Burrows were also on the doomed flight, along with Sydney-based Gu Naijun and Li Yuan.  

Key dates in the search for missing MH370


March 8, 2014: MH370 disappears from the radar 40 minutes into its flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 227 passengers and 12 crew on board

April 8, 2014: An Australian ship hears two signals consistent with MH370’s flight recorders in waters west of Australia. ‘I’m now optimistic that we will find the aircraft, or what is left of the aircraft, in the not-too-distant future,’ search coordinator Angus Houston says

April 28, 2014: The air search ends after failing to see a single piece of debris in 4.6 million square km of ocean

Jan 29, 2015: Malaysia formally declares MH370 an accident and says all 239 people on board are presumed dead

March 8, 2015: Australia’s then-Prime Minister Tony Abbott doubles the area of the underwater search to 120,000 square km

July 29, 2015: A wing part known as a flaperon found on Reunion Island, east of Madagascar, is the first piece of the plane to be recovered. Since then, 27 pieces have been found

July 28, 2016: Data from flight captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah’s home simulator shows it was used to plot a course to the southern Indian Ocean, bolstering speculation he ditched the plane in a premeditated plot

Dec 20, 2016: The Australian Transport Safety Bureau says MH370 is unlikely to be in the 120,000 sq km search area is more likely in an area immediately to the north

Jan 17, 2017: Search is called off

Jan 19, 2017: Malaysia offers cash rewards to private parties for ‘substantial information or evidence’ about the location of the wreckage

April 21, 2017: The CSIRO releases a report saying the most likely location of the jet is a new 25,000 sq km area, north of the original 120,000 sq km search area

January 3, 2018: The search resumes after Malaysia enters into a ‘no find, no fee’ arrangement with US company Ocean Infinity, with up to $70 million offered if the wreckage is found

March 3, 2018: Malaysia says the new search will likely end in June, as families of passengers mark four years since the plane disappeared

May 29, 2018: Second search is called off

July 30, 2018: Investigators release what was flagged as the final report into the aviation mystery, but say the search may resume and it cannot be the final report until wreckage is found. They said they did not believe the pilot was behind the change in direction and ‘unlawful interference by a third party’ could not be ruled out

Source: Read Full Article